Over the weekend, Congress in a shameful act of service to the campaign
contributions of the entertainment industry passed "PRO-IP" legislation that
requires our government to work directly on the industry's behalf against the
public interest. Under the deceptive banner of "intellectual
property", the bill as passed has
several unacceptable
provisions.
Besides over $23 million in congressional campaign
contributions,
the industry used scare tactics to get it passed, trying to draw a connection
between copyright infringement and...terrorism. The bill expresses the "Sense
of Congress" as agreeing that "terrorists and organized crime utilize
piracy, counterfeiting, and infringement to fund some of their activities;" and that stopping copyright infringement should be among the highest
priorities of government. This attitude sets us up for a future world of
Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) and large-scale seizure of computer
equipment the industry accuses of being involved in filesharing.
We have one more chance to stop this bill from becoming law. Bush has yet to
sign it. Given the fact that his Department of Justice publicly objected to it
earlier, Bush may veto it. But we can't count on that -- your calls and e-mails
to the White House could make the difference.
Take Action
Help get the word out so more people know that now is a critical time. Pass
this around to your friends and family, and:
Call the White House at +1 202-456-1111 to leave your comment; then follow up
with an e-mail to comments@whitehouse.gov. Please CC us at
info@defectivebydesign.org.
When you call, you might say something like:
I'm very disappointed that Congress has put the PRO-IP / Enforcement of
Intellectual Property bill on the President's desk. It's clearly a gift to the
entertainment industry special interest groups in return for their massive
congressional campaign contributions. The bill unconstitutionally attempts to
specify how the executive branch should enforce copyright and trademark laws,
and attempts to dictate the overall priorities of the Department of Justice.
You should reject this and any other bill that describes itself as addressing
"intellectual property" -- that term is always an indication that someone is
trying to confuse the issue toward a particular agenda, since legal areas like
patents, trademarks and copyright are all very distinct. I urge you to veto
this bill, sending a clear signal to Congress that the MPAA and the RIAA will
not dictate the behavior of our law enforcement agencies, and that you do not
support this kind of attack on the public interest. Copyright in particular
exists to promote the public interest in advancing science and the arts -- not
hoarding and prosecution. The property seizure and other provisions in this
bill just go too far.